tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1944926148473713281.post4831576439828533652..comments2024-03-11T04:42:50.934-07:00Comments on News, tips, tricks and more about DevExpress Application Framework (XAF) directly from the lab: Minor usability improvement - Nullable values support for boolean property editorsDennis Garavskyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05439634942797151905noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1944926148473713281.post-29970650540904619112016-09-09T00:46:20.185-07:002016-09-09T00:46:20.185-07:00@Sascha: We are happy to hear that this improvemen...@Sascha: We are happy to hear that this improvement was helpful!Dennis Garavskyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05439634942797151905noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1944926148473713281.post-82027026964877805912016-09-08T22:47:55.940-07:002016-09-08T22:47:55.940-07:00Dennis & Team, thanks! Needed it a view months...Dennis & Team, thanks! Needed it a view months ago and was a little dissapointed that such a 'default'-behaviour needed some custom code. Now, the world looks nicer again. Will change my code immediately.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11316302286970423919noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1944926148473713281.post-21519226723328182892016-09-02T09:19:53.981-07:002016-09-02T09:19:53.981-07:00Hi Michael,
This post is about nullable booleans, ...Hi Michael,<br />This post is about nullable booleans, but you already have 4 or more than 3 possible values (true,false,null) here...It seems that you need an enumeration or reference type property for this task. If so, it is already possible to supply a null value text for them.Dennis Garavskyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05439634942797151905noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1944926148473713281.post-19511020881752030942016-09-02T05:12:01.838-07:002016-09-02T05:12:01.838-07:00Hi Dennis,
I would benefit from the NullValueText...Hi Dennis,<br /><br />I would benefit from the NullValueText.<br />e.g. Quality Check: (Ok / NOK / TBD), N/A could result in Quality check not being performed as it would be considered as Not Applicable.Michaelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13130235835944509912noreply@blogger.com